Re: Mistake in git-reset documentation
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Oct 28, 2012, 11:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20121028110715.GB11434@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20121028083610.GA26374@shrek.podlesie.net>
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 09:36:10AM +0100, Krzysztof Mazur wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> -- >8 -- > Subject: [PATCH] doc: git-reset: make "--<mode>" optional > > The git-reset's "--<mode>" is an optional argument, however it was > documented as required. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@podlesie.net>
I think this is sane, but...
Show 11 quoted lines
> DESCRIPTION > ----------- > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ This means that `git reset -p` is the opposite of `git add -p`, i.e. > you can use it to selectively reset hunks. See the ``Interactive Mode'' > section of linkgit:git-add[1] to learn how to operate the `--patch` mode. > > -'git reset' --<mode> [<commit>]:: > +'git reset' [--<mode>] [<commit>]:: > This form resets the current branch head to <commit> and > possibly updates the index (resetting it to the tree of <commit>) and > the working tree depending on <mode>, which
Should we say something like "if --<mode> is omitted, defaults to "--mixed"?
-Peff