Re: [PATCH 2/5] completion: fix args of run_completion() test helper

> SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:04:05AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de> writes:
> >> 
> >> > To simulate the the user hit 'git <TAB>, one of the completion tests
> >
> > s/the the/that the/
> >
> >> > sets up the rather strange command line
> >> >
> >> >   git ""
> >> >
> >> > i.e. the second word on the command line consists of two double
> >> > quotes.  However, this is not what happens for real, because after
> >> > 'git <TAB>' the second word on the command line is just an empty
> >> > string.  Luckily, the test works nevertheless.
> >> >
> >> > Fix this by passing the command line to run_completion() as separate
> >> > words.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de>
> >> > ---
> >> >  t/t9902-completion.sh | 8 ++++----
> >> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/t/t9902-completion.sh b/t/t9902-completion.sh
> >> > index e7657537..f5e68834 100755
> >> > --- a/t/t9902-completion.sh
> >> > +++ b/t/t9902-completion.sh
> >> > @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ run_completion ()
> >> >  {
> >> >  	local -a COMPREPLY _words
> >> >  	local _cword
> >> > -	_words=( $1 )
> >> > +	_words=( "$@" )
> >> >  	(( _cword = ${#_words[@]} - 1 ))
> >> >  	__git_wrap__git_main && print_comp
> >> >  }
> >> > @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ run_completion ()
> >> >  test_completion ()
> >> >  {
> >> >  	test $# -gt 1 && echo "$2" > expected
> >> > -	run_completion "$@" &&
> >> > +	run_completion $1 &&
> >> >  	test_cmp expected out
> >> >  }
> >> 
> >> I can understand the other three hunks, but this one is fishy.
> >> Shouldn't "$1" be inside a pair of dq?  I.e.
> >> 
> >> 	+	run_completion "$1" &&
> >
> > No.  $1 holds all words on the command line.  If it was between a pair
> > of dq, then the whole command line would be passed to the completion
> > script as a single word.
> 
> And these "words" can be split at $IFS boundaries without any
> issues?  IOW, nobody would ever want to make words array in the
> run_completion function to ['git' 'foo bar' 'baz']?