Re: git blame --follow
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Sep 6, 2012, 15:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20120906151317.GB7407@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <k29sup$2e0$1@ger.gmane.org>
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:12:42PM +0200, norbert.nemec wrote:
> The option should either be rejected or do *something* documented and > useful. Ideally, it should result in behavior that matches 'git log > --follow' as closely as possible. So maybe, it should be a synonym > for a certain number of "-C" options?
But I don't see how it would match "git log --follow", as that is a fundamentally different operation that makes no sense in the context of blame (why would you be adjusting the pathspec? There is no pathspec). A synonym for "-C" would just confuse things more, as log also has "-C" and it is not a synonym there.
So if anything, I'd say to simply reject it. It's not documented, and it never did anything useful. Patches welcome.
-Peff