Re: [PATCH 2/2] completion: split __git_ps1 into a separate script
- From
SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de>
- Date
- May 25, 2012, 07:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20120525073506.GD2052@goldbirke>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAOnadRFbrhrFz7Ya3Vhgsju9G723Qu0OdJnM31xFmBqQNgj6gA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:36:45PM -0400, Ted Pavlic wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> > You mean a real git command, which does the same as __gitdir()? I > > don't like that, because it will always require 2 fork()s and an > > exec() and would be slow on Windows. > > Interesting. I guess I didn't realize bash completion was an issue for most > Windows users. Is it?
It is. Emulating fork() and exec() is very expensive, so every subshell, external command, or especially git command in a command substitution costs dearly. And the completion script uses many git commands and even more subshells.
Case in point is __git_ps1() and __gitdir(). There are scenarios where displaying the git-specific bash prompt takes more than 400ms on Windows, while displaying the same prompt takes only about 26ms on Linux on the same hardware.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/197432
Best, Gábor