Re: [PATCH 4/5] Be more specific if upstream branch is not fetched
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Apr 12, 2012, 20:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20120412204055.GA21018@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vd37dgevr.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 08:15:52AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> In other words, the fetch refspec could be without colon. With
>
> [remote "origin"]
> url = ...
> fetch = refs/heads/master
> [branch "master"]
> remote = origin
> merge = refs/heads/master
>
> you can still say "git pull" without any other argument while on your
> "master" and it will do the right thing. Actually, you do not even have
> to have remote.origin.fetch at all (branch.master.merge will be added to
> the set of refs to be fetched).
>
> In such a case "master@{upstream}" does not (and should not) resolve to
> anything, and the reason is not because it is not "fetched", but as Peff
> said, because it is not "stored".Exactly. That was the distinction I was trying to make, but you explained it much better.
-Peff