Re: [PATCH] push: error out when the "upstream" semantics does not make sense
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 5, 2012, 20:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20120405202327.GB6885@burratino>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vhawy54nd.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> How about phrasing it this way?
[ fatal: You are pushing to remote '%s', which is not the upstream of your current branch '%s', without telling me to push which local branch to update which remote branch with. ]
I think some words got jumbled a little. But in that spirit, maybe here's a start:
fatal: You are pushing to remote 'somethinglong', which is not the upstream of your current branch 'something/very/long', without telling me which local branches to use to update which remote branches.