Re: [PATCH] builtin/index-pack.c: Fix some pthread_t misuse
- From
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 8, 2012, 01:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20120308012953.GA8444@duynguyen-vnpc.dek-tpc.internal>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vvcmgmde3.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 11:15:00AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 33 quoted lines
> Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> writes:
>
> > However, pthread_t is intended to be an opaque (implementation defined)
> > type. For example, an implementation may choose to use a structure to
> > implement the type. Therefore, assigning zero (or any other constant)
> > to a pthread_t is not supported in general.
> > ...
> > Note that, for the same reason given above, you can not, in general,
> > directly compare pthread_t handles with the built-in equality operator.
> > In order to compare pthread_t's for equality, the POSIX standard requires
> > the use of pthread_equal().
>
> Thanks, the above analysis all sound sensible.
>
> I do not think it matters in *this* case, but if a loop iterates
> over an array of things with a field of type pthread_t in it, whose
> element may or may not be valid, and wants to mark the validity of
> an element with the value of its pthread_t field, what is the proper
> way to do so? I.e.
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(thread_data); i++) {
> if (pthread_invalid(thread_data[i].thread)
> continue; /* not used */
> if (!pthread_equal(self, thread_data[i].thread))
> continue; /* not me */
> /* ah, this is mine! */
> ...
> }
>
> Perhaps the answer is "Don't do it" and that is perfectly fine, but
> does Nguyen's code rely on the final clean-up (assignment with 0 you
> are removing with this patch) to mark that these elements are no
> longer relevant?The 0 assignment is not strictly needed. Shortly after that, nr_threads is set back to 1, which makes thread_data[1..] inaccessible, and thread_data[0] is dedicated for the main thread already.
We can get rid of pthread_t comparison by using TLS (I avoided this because this would be the first time pthread_getspecific is used in git).
Does this help your crash Ramsay? It also moves down cleanup_thread() so counter_mutex is always valid when it's used. Seems to work with linux-2.6.git.
-- 8< --
diff --git a/builtin/index-pack.c b/builtin/index-pack.c index edd7cbd..098f350 100644 --- a/builtin/index-pack.c +++ b/builtin/index-pack.c @@ -104,6 +104,8 @@ static pthread_mutex_t work_mutex; #define work_lock() pthread_mutex_lock(&work_mutex) #define work_unlock() pthread_mutex_unlock(&work_mutex) +static pthread_key_t key; + /* * Mutex and conditional variable can't be statically-initialized on Windows. */ @@ -111,6 +113,7 @@ static void init_thread(void) { init_recursive_mutex(&read_mutex); pthread_mutex_init(&work_mutex, NULL); + pthread_key_create(&key, NULL); } static void cleanup_thread(void) @@ -284,31 +287,19 @@ static NORETURN void bad_object(unsigned long offset, const char *format, ...) static struct thread_local *get_thread_data(void) { #ifndef NO_PTHREADS - int i; - pthread_t self = pthread_self(); - for (i = 1; i < nr_threads; i++) - if (self == thread_data[i].thread) - return &thread_data[i]; + if (nr_threads > 1) + return pthread_getspecific(key); #endif + assert(nr_threads == 1 && + "This should only be reached when all threads are gone"); return &thread_data[0]; } static void resolve_one_delta(void) { -#ifndef NO_PTHREADS - int i; - pthread_t self = pthread_self(); - for (i = 1; i < nr_threads; i++) - if (self == thread_data[i].thread) { - counter_lock(); - nr_resolved_deltas++; - counter_unlock(); - return; - } -#endif - assert(nr_threads == 1 && - "This should only be reached when all threads are gone"); + counter_lock(); nr_resolved_deltas++; + counter_unlock(); } static struct base_data *alloc_base_data(void) @@ -796,6 +787,7 @@ static void second_pass(struct object_entry *obj) static void *threaded_second_pass(void *arg) { + pthread_setspecific(key, arg); for (;;) { int i, nr = 16; work_lock(); @@ -883,15 +875,12 @@ static void parse_pack_objects(unsigned char *sha1) init_thread(); for (i = 1; i < nr_threads; i++) { int ret = pthread_create(&thread_data[i].thread, NULL, - threaded_second_pass, NULL); + threaded_second_pass, thread_data + i); if (ret) die("unable to create thread: %s", strerror(ret)); } - for (i = 1; i < nr_threads; i++) { + for (i = 1; i < nr_threads; i++) pthread_join(thread_data[i].thread, NULL); - thread_data[i].thread = 0; - } - cleanup_thread(); /* stop get_thread_data() from looking up beyond the first item, when fix_unresolved_deltas() runs */ @@ -1411,6 +1400,9 @@ int cmd_index_pack(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) die("pack has %d unresolved deltas", nr_deltas - nr_resolved_deltas); } +#ifndef NO_PTHREADS + cleanup_thread(); +#endif free(deltas); if (strict) check_objects(); -- 8< --