Re: [PATCH] cherry-pick: No advice to commit if --no-commit
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 21, 2012, 22:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20120221222049.GA31934@burratino>
- In-Reply-To
- <1329858317-3066-1-git-send-email-hordp@cisco.com>
Hi Phil,
Phil Hord wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Phil Hord <hordp@cisco.com>
Thanks.
> +++ b/sequencer.c
[...]
Show 12 quoted lines
> @@ -138,10 +138,12 @@ static void print_advice(int show_hint)
> return;
> }
>
> - if (show_hint)
> + if (show_hint) {
> advise(_("after resolving the conflicts, mark the corrected paths\n"
> - "with 'git add <paths>' or 'git rm <paths>'\n"
> - "and commit the result with 'git commit'"));
> + "with 'git add <paths>' or 'git rm <paths>'"));
> + if (!opts->no_commit)
> + advise(_( "and commit the result with 'git commit'"));"cherry-pick --no-commit" was not about to commit, but the user might have been. I think the hint is intended to convey that authorship will be correctly preserved if the user continues with "git commit" and no special -c option is necessary.
Could you say a little more about the motivation for this patch? For example, did the existing message confuse someone, or was it grating in the context of some particular workflow?
A smaller detail: splitting the message into two like this gives translators less control over how to phrase the message and where to wrap lines. Luckily that is easy to fix with
if (opts->no_commit) advise(...); else advise(...);
which means more flexibility in phrasing the message with pertinent advice for each case. ;-)
Ciao, Jonathan