git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Debugging git-commit slowness on a large repo

From
Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de>
Date
Dec 3, 2011, 00:23 UTC
Message-ID
<20111203002347.GB2950@centaur.lab.cmartin.tk>
In-Reply-To
<CAFE9C7B.2BFEC%joshua.redstone@fb.com>
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:17:10PM +0000, Joshua Redstone wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Hi,
> I have a git repo with about 300k commits,  150k files totaling maybe 7GB.
>  Locally committing a small change - say touching fewer than 300 bytes
> across 4 files - consistently takes over one second, which seems kinda
> slow.  This is using git 1.7.7.4 on a linux 2.6 box.  The time does not
> improve after doing a git-gc (my .git dir has maybe 250 files after a git
> gc).  The same size commit on a brand new repo takes < 10ms.  Any thoughts
> on why committing a small change seems to take a long time on larger repos?

By "same size commit" do you mean the same amount of changes, or the same amount of files? Committing doesn't depend on the size of the repo (by itself), but on the size of the index, which depends on the amount of files to be committed (as git is snapshot-based). At one point, commit forgot how to write the tree cache to the index (a performance optimisation). Do the times improve if you run 'git read-tree HEAD' between one commit and another? Note that this will reset the index to the last commit, though for the tests I image you use some variation of 'git commit -a'.

Thomas Rast wrote a patch to re-teach commit to store the tree cache, but there were some issues and never got applied.

> 
> Fwiw, I also tried doing the same test using libgit2 (via the pygit2
> wrapper), and it was ever slower (about 6 seconds to commit the same small
> change).

I don't know about the python bindings, but on the (somewhat unscientific) tests for libgit2's write-tree (the slow part of a creating a commit), it performs slightly faster than git's (though I think git's write-tree does update the tree cache, which libgit2 doesn't currently). The speed could just be a side-effect of the small test repo. From your domain, I assume the data is not for public consumption, but it'd be great if you could post your code to pygit2's issue tracker so we can see how much of the slowdown comes from the bindings or the library.

   cmn
Previous: Joshua RedstoneNext: Junio C Hamano
Message 2 of 16 in “Debugging git-commit slowness on a large repo”
  1. Joshua RedstoneDec 2, 2011
  2. Carlos Martín NietoDec 3, 2011
  3. Junio C HamanoDec 5, 2011
  4. Joshua RedstoneDec 7, 2011
  5. Nguyen Thai Ngoc DuyDec 7, 2011
  6. Joshua RedstoneDec 7, 2011
  7. Nguyen Thai Ngoc DuyDec 8, 2011
  8. Joshua RedstoneDec 9, 2011
  9. Joshua RedstoneDec 9, 2011
  10. Joshua RedstoneDec 13, 2011
  11. Joshua RedstoneDec 20, 2011
  12. Junio C HamanoDec 20, 2011
  13. Joshua RedstoneDec 20, 2011
  14. Thomas RastDec 20, 2011
  15. Joshua RedstoneDec 20, 2011
  16. Tomas CarneckyDec 4, 2011

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.