Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add an update=none option for 'loose' submodules
- From
Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net>
- Date
- Aug 22, 2011, 20:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110822200052.GC11745@sandbox-rc>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vy5yujtr2.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 01:37:53PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net> writes: > > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:28:31AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net> writes: > >> > We have been talking about loose submodules for some time: > >> > >> Also before introducing a new terminology "loose submodule", please define > >> it somewhere. It feels confusing to me that a normal submodule, which > >> shouldn't be auto-cloned nor auto-updated without "submodule init", needs > >> to be called by a name other than simply a "submodule" but with an > >> adjuctive "loose submodule". > > > > Thats why I avoided talking about it in the docs. For the commit message > > I thought it would be kind of intuitive but I can update the commit > > message so that it becomes more clear. > > That sounds like a good thing to do.
I discovered that I only talked in the cover letter about the term 'loose'. Since that will not go into any commit I guess we can keep the series this way?
Cheers Heiko