Re: Suggestions to make git easier to understand
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Aug 12, 2011, 22:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110812222626.GA7079@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110811221627.GA32005@elie.gateway.2wire.net>
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:16:27PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> > http://raflabs.com/blogs/silence-is-foo/2011/04/07/staging-area-index-cache-git/ > > > > I thought it made some good points about git being kinda confusing, > > for example sentences like "Changed but not updated" in git status > > could use a better sentence like "Changed but not in the index". > > Sounds reasonable (well, with some more precise wording to reflect > that this means "changed but not all changes are reflected in the > index").
Didn't we fix this already in 8009d83 (Better "Changed but not updated" message in git-status, 2010-11-02)? Since v1.7.4, "git status" has "Changes not staged for commit".
-Peff