Re: git-archive's wrong documentation: really write pax rather than tar
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Aug 4, 2011, 02:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110804020054.GA1947@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v62me6ism.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 06:56:41PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes: > > > It might be a bit more obvious to find if we actually had a > > --no-pax-header option, though. > > Yeah, we would need to make sure that --no-pack-header causes a barf > for other backends, though. "struct archiver_args" right now seems to have > compression_level but I think it should just have "const char **" that is > interpreted by backends.
Actually, it is relevant for zip, too. The option should really be called "--no-commit-id" or something similar. I don't think it's as big a deal with zip (because there is no compatibility issue), but you may want to omit the header for other reasons (e.g., because you know it doesn't point to a commit that is public).
-Peff