Re: [GSoC update] Sequencer: Debating the UI
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 14, 2011, 05:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110614053143.GA24882@elie>
- In-Reply-To
- <BANLkTinxx5qFuhwsUt3JeXOO7TjBj8wFvw@mail.gmail.com>
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> I might like > to send a quick series based on my earlier series for inclusion, but I > can't figure out a good subset:
I would love to use a working "cherry-pick --continue". :) I would use it like this:
$ : grumble, grumble, source package format that requires a $ : tarball followed by a linear sequence of patches $ git checkout -b release+patches v1.0 $ git cherry-pick --no-merges -x -s HEAD..origin/master ... ticks away for a while, then presents a conflict $ git diff; fix fix fix; git add -u; make test; git commit -v $ git cherry-pick --continue ...
$ git diff origin/master; # matches up? good. $ git format-patch -k --patience -o patches v1.0..HEAD
Speaking of which, do you have a git tree that testers should use / send patches against? E.g., is the "sequencer" branch at git://github.com/artagnon/git.git the one to play with?
Thanks; exciting times.
Regards, Jonathan