Re: Git notes list/show <revision-range>
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Apr 19, 2011, 20:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110419203211.GA12071@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <4DAD371F.9040003@drmicha.warpmail.net>
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 09:17:51AM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> But since the OP is volunteering to code for notes :-) > We could need a feature which allows to log the history of a note. The alias > > `git noteslog' is aliased to `!sh -c 'git log $(git notes get-ref) "$@"' -' > > gives you the history of the notes tree (try it with "-p"),
Hmm, I just use "git log notes/<whatever>", which works fine. It does help if you know that the default ref is "notes/commits", though.
It's not something I do often, though (most of my notes use has been things that automatically make notes, so the history tends to be uninteresting and useful only for debugging the note-making code).
Show 11 quoted lines
> sometimes I would like the history of the notes to a specific commit, and in > > git noteslog -p -- $(commit) > > I would have to use for $(commit) all possible breakdowns of the sha1 of > the commit for all possible notes tree structures. It feels as of the > revision walker needs to learn another pathspec, say > > ":(note):<sha1>" > > in line with our magic pathspec discussion.
That's a clever solution. It is a little non-intuitive for a user to need to know about notes storage, though. Maybe you were already thinking this, but we could have something like:
git notes log [revs] [--] [pathspec]
where "[revs]" are checked for in refs/notes/*, defaulting to "refs/notes/commits". And each element of the pathspec gets the ":(note):" magic automatically. I wonder if we could even resolve the pathspec bits as regular refs.
So you could write:
# long form, just as you can do with "git log" git notes log notes/commits -- ":(note):`git rev-parse HEAD`"
# or with automagic ref lookup for pathspec git notes log notes/commits -- HEAD
# and automagic default ref git notes log -- HEAD
# and I think you should be able to write a disambiguator similar to # what we use for the revs/paths distinction, but this time for # notes-refs versus regular refs. And then drop the "--": git notes log HEAD
I think it would need a little refactoring of setup_revisions() to be more flexible, but most of the hard work is already done by the usual revision traversal mechanism.
-Peff