Re: small git lesson [Was: Re: Revert 737a3bb9416ce2a7c7a4170852473a4fcc9c67e8 ?]
- From
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
- Date
- Apr 13, 2011, 09:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110413093608.GO18850@pengutronix.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <m339lm8r31.fsf@redhat.com>
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:59:14AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> writes: > > > $ git name-rev --refs=refs/tags/v2.6\* 69a07f0b117a40fcc1a479358d8e1f41793617f2 > > 69a07f0b117a40fcc1a479358d8e1f41793617f2 tags/v2.6.39-rc2~3^2~43^2~4 > > > > so it was introduced just before -rc2. > > $ git tag --contains 69a07f0b117a40fcc1a479358d8e1f41793617f2 > v2.6.39-rc1 > v2.6.39-rc2
huh, I thought git name-rev prefers old[1] refs (similar to describe prefering newer).
$ for rc in 1 2; do git name-rev --refs=refs/tags/v2.6.39-rc$rc 69a07f0b1; done 69a07f0b1 tags/v2.6.39-rc1~79^2~31^2~4 69a07f0b1 tags/v2.6.39-rc2~3^2~43^2~4
I would prefer the v2.6.39-rc1 name even though it's nearer[1] at v2.6.39-rc2.
If it should stay as is, what is the best way to find out the oldest tag? Best regards Uwe
[1] as in minimizing
git rev-list 69a07f0b117a..$ref | wc -l
(v2.6.39-rc1 -> 21281; v2.6.39-rc2 -> 21608)
[2] as in minimizing the number of traversing a parent link.
-- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |