Re: GSoC questions
- From
Jeff King <peff@github.com>
- Date
- Mar 31, 2011, 19:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110331193128.GE16981@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTikMsQHL9RMm=uOse+OObavMNc=PJE7aOqA-WMkY@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 09:34:15PM +0300, Alexandru Sutii wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> > Maybe I'm aiming at too much here. It could well be that it is worth > > writing the minimal git client to just be able to test libgit2 using > > the git tests. Does anyone want to comment ? > > Hello! > > There have been a lot on discussions on the mailing list regarding > on what this client should look like and I understand that we are > expected to come with a specific approach. Also I understand there is > no interest for this project to become large.
It's OK if the project is large; it's inherently a big thing. But it's important to bite off a small enough, useful chunk of it and work on that. One, because you want something small enough to finish in the GSoC time-frame. But two, because a small, solid start on a larger project is much more useful to the community as a whole than a larger chunk that is not-so-solid. Because people in the community (and you, if you want to keep working on it!) may pick up the project from its state at the end of the summer.
> Considering this circumstances I think we should implement the client > with the basic commands by reusing git's high level code. I am for building > it independently of the git's mainstream.
Yeah, I had always assumed it would build independent of git's mainstream.
-Peff