Re: git fast-import : How to change parent during import?
- From
Vitor Antunes <vitor.hda@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 30, 2011, 17:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110330182554.5375787b@fenix.utopia.dhis.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110308222328.GE26471@elie>
Hi Jonathan,
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 16:23:28 -0600 Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> The "tag fixup" idea is that in VCSes like CVS, tags do not > necessarily match the content on any branch. So the history looks > somewhat like so (time flowing left to right): > > TAG > / > o --- o --- o --- o --- o --- o ... > > instead of the perhaps more sensible > > o --- o --- o --- TAG --- o --- o ... > > The side branch leading up to a tag does not correspond to any branch > name; after it is in the correct state one can use the "tag" command > to get it remembered in permanent history. The same technique might > be useful whenever you are creating history that is not meant to stay > permanently on any branch.
I don't think the TAG_FIXUP trick is what I need in this case. Assume the following:
A --- B --- C --- D ... (branch1)
\
E --- F --- G ... (branch2)Now assume that we are at commit D when we detect a commit to branch2. At this point there is no way of knowing the origin commit in branch1. What is currently being done is to use commit D as the parent of branch2, which is incorrect. But if we assume that all branches are created through a "cp" like command, then we know that B=E. So my idea is to go over A, B, C, etc and commit E "from:" each one and see which results in a zero differences diff-tree.
Unfortunately, the current implementation I am using doesn't feel simple enough. Because I'm using commands external to fast-import, I need to be constantly making use of "checkpoint". And this seems to not be good enough, because I need to sleep during 0.1s (didn't try other values) after each "checkpoint" before being able to use diff-tree and similar commands. I am also forced to use the "--force" command due to all the orphan commits I leave behind.
I would really prefer to have a simpler solution. Do you, or anyone else, see another option?
Thanks in advance,
-- Vitor Antunes