Re: configuring cherry-pick to always use -x?

From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Date: Feb 15, 2011, 09:18 UTC
Message-ID: <20110215091828.GA22661@elie>
In-Reply-To: <4D5A401B.1050103@drmicha.warpmail.net>

Michael J Gruber wrote:

> - If you do want them on the same branch "f-release", you probably know
> beforehand which commits you don't want on master. You can fake-merge
> these ("merge -Xours") to master and merge the others

For the record, I think that should be -sours.

I think it's just a typo but the difference is big --- -sours means "supersede by pretending to merge but actually keeping our version", while -Xours means "do a normal merge but be sloppy and favor our change when encountering adjacent or overlapping changes".

I suppose -Xours should have been named -Xfavor-ours, -Xsloppy-favoring-ours, or something similarly explicit.

Show 7 quoted lines

> git checkout master
> git merge f-release
> #be happy if it succeeds, identify problematic commit X if not; decide
> whether X belongs on master; if yes resolve, if not reset and:
> git merge X^
> git merge -Xours X
> #back to start

Thanks for a nice example. Jonathan