Re: Why git tags are there in git?
- From
- Konstantin Khomoutov <flatworm@users.sourceforge.net>
- Date
- Jan 28, 2011, 16:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110128190628.f507599e.kostix@domain007.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1296214676536-5969544.post@n2.nabble.com>
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 03:37:56 -0800 (PST) vikram2rhyme <vikram2rhyme@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> I am wondering why the tags are there in git. As they are just > pointer to the commit > we can refer those commit by SHA sum only then why tagging? Moreover a > commit can > be tagged more than once that result in multiple tags pointing to the > same point in the history. > Is this a design flaw?
Amending what other commenters said, I should note that beyond regular tags which just provide human-readable names to objects, there exist so-called "annotated tags" which are tags with descriptive messages contained in them, which can be used as a side-channel to provide additional information for commits, and also to digitally sign a line of history to which such a tag is attached.
Also note that a tag can be attached to any object in a Git database, not necessarily to a commit. This can be occasionally useful.