Re: Fwd: Git and Large Binaries: A Proposed Solution
- From
Wesley J. Landaker <wjl@icecavern.net>
- Date
- Jan 21, 2011, 21:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <201101211436.32033.wjl@icecavern.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTimPua_kz2w33BRPeTtOEWOKDCsJzf0sqxm=db68@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday, January 21, 2011 11:57:21 Eric Montellese wrote:
> To whet your appetite to read all of the below (I know it's long), > this is the root of the solution: > > --- Don't track binaries in git. Track their hashes. ---
Comment from the peanut gallery:
I haven't read your approach in great detail, but just in case you are not aware, there is a project call git-annex <http://git-annex.branchable.com/> by Joey Hess that I believe takes a similar approach.
Since you've obviously given this a lot of thought, you might want to take a peek at that and see if it already does what you want, or if your proposal does something significantly different/better.