Re: [PATCH] commit: suggest --amend --reset-author to fix commiter identity
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jan 11, 2011, 05:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110111053451.GA10094@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <vpq1v4nirzz.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 11:56:00AM +0100, Matthieu Moy wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> > Wouldn't it work better to just get rid of the longer form and say > > something like: > > > > ... here is how to tell your name to git (existing message) ... > > > > After doing the above, run > > > > git commit --amend --reset-author > > > > to fix the identity used for this commit. > > I'm fine with that proposal too. I'll resend with that if no one > objects. Probalby rewording it to
Hmm. When I originally wrote that message, I specifically avoided using --reset-author because I figured people would want to most immediately fix the broken commit, and then maybe would not be too lazy to fix things for the future. But that was just a hunch, and I don't feel strongly about it.
I was also afraid of people blindly running the fixup command without doing the configuration specified in the commands above. However, I think as long as the text makes it clear that one depends on the other, it should be OK. So something like:
> After doing this, you can fix the identity used for this commit with: > > git commit --amend --reset-author
looks fine to me.
-Peff