Re: [PATCH] Mark gitk script executable
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 7, 2011, 03:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110107030119.GA32290@burratino>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vlj2x8mr4.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Anders Kaseorg <andersk@MIT.EDU> writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
>> The executable bit on gitk-git/gitk was lost (accidentally it seems) by >> commit 62ba5143ec2ab9d4083669b1b1679355e7639cd5. Put it back, so that >> gitk can be run directly from a git.git checkout. >> >> Note that the script is already executable in gitk.git, just not in >> git.git. > > It did not lose the bit by accident but 62ba5143 pretty much was a > deliberate fix. "gitk" is a source file, and its build product, > gitk-wish, is what is eventually installed with executable bit on.
How does this case differ from other executable source files like git-am.sh?