Re: False positives in git diff-index
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jan 5, 2011, 05:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110105054825.GC5884@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTinDSCPz-oukxzn24hj94d9WpzZ8_64TBHeNTmoG@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 12:45:33PM +0300, Alexander Gladysh wrote:
Show 23 quoted lines
> > Anyway, I'm ready to debug this issue if someone will guide me. > > > > Workflow: > > > > <...change files in /path/dir1/...> > > (cd /path && git add </path/dir1/>) > > (cd /path && git commit -m <message1>) > > > > ... repeat change-add-commit several times for various directories > > (can be the same directory or not) ... > > > > <...generate file /path/dirN/foo...> > > # Accidentally the file is generated the same as it was > > > > (cd /path && git add </path/dirN/>) > > (cd /path && git status) # Refresh index > > (cd /path && git diff-index --exit-code --quiet HEAD -- /path/dirN) # > > Incorrectly reports that there are some changes > > (cd /path && git commit -m <messageN>) # fails, saying that there is > > nothing to commit > > > > If I insert sleep 10 between git status and git diff-index, the > > problem goes away.
If adding a sleep makes it work, that sounds like a race condition in git. But from the description of your workflow, it should be easy to make a minimal example:
-- >8 -- #!/bin/sh
random() {
perl -e 'print int(rand(5))+1, "\n"'
}rm -rf repo mkdir repo && cd repo && git init
for i in 1 2 3 4 5; do mkdir dir$i echo initial >dir$i/file done git add . git commit -m initial
while true; do
for i in 1 2 3 4 5; do
random >dir$i/file
git add dir$i
git update-index --refresh
if ! git diff-index --exit-code --quiet HEAD -- dir$i; then
if ! git commit -m foo; then
echo breakage
exit 1
fi
else
echo not bothering to commit
fi
done
done
-- 8< --Basically, we generate random data which has a 20% chance of being the same as what's there. When it is, we should get "not bothering to commit", but in your error case, we would try to commit (and get "no changes").
But using that script, I can't replicate your problem. Can you try running it on the same box you're having trouble with? That might at least tell us if it's your environment or something more complex going on.
-Peff