Re: [PATCH 7/8] docs: use <commit> instead of <commit-ish>
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 18, 2010, 08:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20101218083925.GD6187@burratino>
- In-Reply-To
- <1292650725-21149-8-git-send-email-lodatom@gmail.com>
Mark Lodato wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> --- a/Documentation/git-describe.txt > +++ b/Documentation/git-describe.txt > @@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ see the -a and -s options to linkgit:git-tag[1]. > > OPTIONS > ------- > -<committish>...:: > - Committish object names to describe. > +<commit>...:: > + Commit object names to describe.
Or even
Commits to describe.
:)
Show 10 quoted lines
> --- a/Documentation/git-fast-import.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-fast-import.txt
> @@ -350,8 +350,8 @@ change to the project.
> ('author' (SP <name>)? SP LT <email> GT SP <when> LF)?
> 'committer' (SP <name>)? SP LT <email> GT SP <when> LF
> data
> - ('from' SP <committish> LF)?
> - ('merge' SP <committish> LF)?
> + ('from' SP <commit> LF)?
> + ('merge' SP <commit> LF)?As the audience of this manual page is people mostly familiar with other version control systems, it needs to be very explicit. Not sure what the best solution is, just pointing out the worry.