Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2010, #01; Sat, 4)
- From
- Yann Dirson <dirson@bertin.fr>
- Date
- Dec 6, 2010, 08:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20101206094806.10ae1ff2@chalon.bertin.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTimPC3-x1XFJ+t9uiFFXV6fg812ugF5vz9p=4GWB@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:39:54 +0900 Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Yann Dirson <dirson@bertin.fr> wrote: > > Seen that argument before. > > 1. does anyone care ? (I personally don't) > > If nobody cared, you wouldn't get an argument.
OK, I can hear that - but well, noone complained till now that --find-copies-harder would sound like "an action to be performed _instead_ of some normal processing".
But most importantly, I don't get much feedback on the direct implication of that choice: are we going to have 2 exact synonyms (--find-copies-harder and --detect-copies-harder) forever, and to what extent (see prev. mail about completion) ?
In the end, I still think the implications for the usability are what matters, more than arguing about a subtle nuance of vocabulary.
-- Yann Dirson - Bertin Technologies