Re: [RFC/PATCH 03/18] usage: implement error_errno() the same way as die_errno()
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 26, 2010, 06:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20101126060747.GD18751@burratino>
- In-Reply-To
- <20101125212050.5188.56613.chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Christian Couder wrote:
> die_errno() is very useful, but sometimes we don't want to > die after printing an error message and the error message > from errno.
Yes, please! I have often wished for this helper.