Re: history missing

From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date: Nov 8, 2010, 13:48 UTC
Message-ID: <201011081448.10723.jnareb@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin2-WAHMjKFKVqq7Wbzvjg-KzMkBh1kCGxDH6Mf@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Martin von Zweigbergk wrote:

Show 31 quoted lines

> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> writes:
>>> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Vitaliy Semochkin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I cloned a remote repository
>>>>> to check recent changes in origin/master I do:
>>>>> git fetch origin master
>>
>> This fetches into FETCH_HEAD _only_ from "origin" *remote*.
>>
>>>>> git log origin master
>>
>> This show log of 'origin/HEAD', which probably is 'origin/master'...
>> but which didn't get updated, and local branch 'master'.
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> recently I found out that log doesn't show recent commits
>>>>
>>>> Yes, this can be confusing.
>>>
>>> I agree and I believe this has come up a lot of times before. I talked
>>> to Jeff and Junio about this at GitTogether and Jeff said he has a patch
>>> for it that he would try to get up to date in a while. (Thanks, Jeff!)
>>
>> How can this issue be solved?  The meaning of parameters in 'git fetch'
>> is different from meaning of parameters in 'git log'.
> 
> Sorry, maybe I misunderstood what the confusion was about. What I was
> referring to was the confusion caused by 'git fetch origin master' not
> updating 'refs/remotes/origin/master'.

Should it really do it? What if it does not exist? What if <remote> is specified via URL?

If I understand correctly current behavior of 'git fetch <remote> <branch>' wrt. FETCH_HEAD was meant for one-off 'git pull <remote> <branch>', or rather 'git pull <URL> <branch>'.

Sidenote: if original poster used

  $ git fetch origin
  $ git log origin

I think everything would be all right.

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland