Re: [PATCH] contrib/ciabot: git-describe commit instead of HEAD
- From
- Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@gmx.de>
- Date
- Oct 11, 2010, 10:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <201010111243.25375.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vd3rp97f7.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 27 quoted lines
> Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@gmx.de> writes: > > For each commit a shorter version of the name will be generated. This is > > either the truncated hash or the output of git-describe. The > > call to git-describe was only made with an empty shell variable instead > > of an actual commit hash. Thus it only described the current HEAD and > > not each commit we want to submit to cia.vc. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@gmx.de> > > --- > > I send this patch already two and four weeks ago and got no reaction. > > This is a resent in case it was forgotton. > > Although the computation of "rev" indeed looks wrong, I do not see it used > anywhere, so it might be a better patch to remove it ... wait, the code > does something funny to slurp everything into xml via ... > > context = locals() > context.update(globals()) > out = xml % context > > Yuck. > > Even though it has been my policy not to complain too loudly on stuff in > contrib/ part of the tree, I have to say that this is a bit too _cute_ for > my taste. > > Anyway, Ok, so it _is_ used. And it needs to be fixed.
Yes, it is a little bit confusing when reading through it, but still it is used. :)
Show 5 quoted lines
> I was hoping that Eric who took over the maintainership of contrib/ciabot/ > directory in April would give his blessing sooner, without me having to > look at the script. > > Ack?
Hm, just be sure, because I saw no other replies since this message: You expected reaction after that "Ack?" from Eric Raymond and not from me, or?
Anyway, thanks for answering :)
Kind regards, Sven