Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] rr/fmt-merge-msg replacement

From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Date: Aug 26, 2010, 05:12 UTC
Message-ID: <20100826051235.GA9407@kytes>
In-Reply-To: <7vhbiiqv8p.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Hi Junio,

Junio C Hamano writes:

Show 12 quoted lines

> Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > This is a replacement for rr/fmt-merge-msg. It corrects the problems
> > pointed out by Jonathan and adds one extra patch. Additionally, I've
> > rebased it so there's no merge conflict when you merge it into `pu`
> > (see: jn/merge-renormalize). 4/5 from v5 has been dropped.
> 
> Thanks, 
> 
> Just as a future reference, in a case like this that results in trivial
> conflict, I'd prefer to see a patch that can be used independently from
> other unrelated branches.

Oh, okay. I think I realize why- if the dependent topics are ejected, you'll have more trouble taking this forward to `next` and `master`, right?

> Maybe you'd want a new test or two in t6200?

Good idea! It'll give me the chance to familiarize myself with test-lib.sh :)

-- Ram