git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH] format-patch: Update the `-3` example

From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Date
Aug 21, 2010, 16:49 UTC
Message-ID
<20100821164900.GD31130@kytes>
In-Reply-To
<201008211659.38608.jnareb@gmail.com>
Hi Jakub,
Jakub Narebski writes:
Show 51 quoted lines
> On Sat, 21 Aug 2010, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> > Ramkumar Ramachandra writes:
> > > Jakub Narebski writes:
> > > > Works for me:
> > > > 
> > > >   5031:[gitweb/split@git]# git format-patch -3
> > > >   0001-gitweb-Prepare-for-splitting-gitweb.txt
> > > >   0002-gitweb-Create-Gitweb-Git-module.txt
> > > > 
> > > >   5034:[gitweb/split@git]# git version
> > > >   git version 1.7.2.1
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > The -3 is git-log option:
> > > > 
> > > >   -<n>   Limits the number of commits to show.
> > > > 
> > > > and also git-format-patch option:
> > > > 
> > > >   -<n>   Limits the number of patches to prepare.
> > > 
> > > Hm, doesn't work on the `pu` Git, but works on `master` -- I'm
> > > currently bisecting to find the problem. `git log -3` works
> > > though.
> > 
> > :facepalm:
> > 
> > Scratch out what I just said -- I just realized that `git format-patch
> > HEAD~3` handles merge commits, but `git format-patch -3` does
> > not. `git format-patch -3 HEAD~3` is even more confusing- should we
> > even advertise the `-<n>` option in format-patch?
> 
> It looks like there is a conceptual bug in how git-format-patch works, 
> namely that '-<n>' is passed to rev-list / log generating machinery, 
> and it limits number of *commits* to consider; if some of those commits 
> are merge commits, which cannot be represented as patches, the number 
> of patches it generates is less than specified <n> (as you can see in 
> the example I have provided, where <n> == 3, and git-format-patch 
> generated 2 patches, not 3).  In extreme case (like 'pu') it can 
> generate no patch.
> 
> I am not sure what the solution should be.  We could either:
> 
> A. Update git-format-patch documentation to say 'commits' instead of
>    'patches', and perhaps also be loud about commits we are skipping,
>    so that my example would look e.g. like this:
> 
>      $ git format-patch -3
>      0001-gitweb-Prepare-for-splitting-gitweb.txt
>      0002-gitweb-Create-Gitweb-Git-module.txt
>      Skipping merge commit: Merge branch 'maint'

Thanks for the awesome explanation! A is definitely the way to go- I'll start writing a patch immediately.

-- Ram
Previous: Jakub Narebski
Message 7 of 7 in “format-patch: Update the `-3` example”
  1. format-patch: Update the `-3` exampleRamkumar Ramachandra, Aug 21, 2010
  2. Jakub NarebskiAug 21, 2010
  3. Ramkumar RamachandraAug 21, 2010
  4. Ramkumar RamachandraAug 21, 2010
  5. Johannes SixtAug 21, 2010
  6. Jakub NarebskiAug 21, 2010
  7. Ramkumar RamachandraAug 21, 2010

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.