Re: Possible feature request for merge and pull
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jul 29, 2010, 01:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20100729010341.GA25732@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTikA2jWu76aPUNG+B7Nwc9eDzoU93VcGvUFWR0Ri@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 04:49:11PM -0400, Avery Pennarun wrote:
> It sounds like --log and -m are currently incompatible, in that -m > overrides --log, and that's not the desired behaviour. Bradley: this > is probably a relatively easy fix to make, in case you're looking to > get into some git hacking. :)
Really? I get:
$ mkdir repo && cd repo && git init &&
echo content >file && git add file && git commit -m one &&
echo content >>file && git commit -a -m two &&
git checkout -b other HEAD^ &&
echo content >file2 && git add file2 && git commit -m three &&
git merge --log -m "custom message" master &&
git showcommit fa21035ea5f5437e8664a5d249e7ab88ee3f0e75 Merge: d12be4a 4dc5cba Author: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Date: Wed Jul 28 20:50:39 2010 -0400
custom message
* master:
twowhich seems to be what was asked for. So is the problem just that git-pull does not take "-m"?
-Peff