Re: git am mangles commit author name.
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 16, 2010, 19:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20100716191954.GB16371@burratino>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTimIkepwy93dYCu5mkdSMHNuh3dbMyxcHPl4hGmt@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Daniel,
Daniel F wrote:
> would simply setting minimum length to 1 have any negative > side effects?
I am not a git maintainer, but I would suggest writing a patch to do that. Then you can try it and see, and send us a copy of the patch when reporting the results.
My guess is Linus wanted to make sure he had meaningful names in patches he applies[1]. There is no technical limit I know of that would lead one to forbid an author name longer than 60 characters, either. So the questions are:
- did any code learn to rely on those limits later? - are any _people_ relying on those limits now?
I suspect the answer to question 2, at least for the lower bound, is no.
Hope that helps, Jonathan
[1] See v0.99.2~51^2~21 (Start of early patch applicator tools for git., 2005-04-11) for the original script.