Re: git-svn: both merged commits and original commits are showing up in branches after migration
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 12, 2010, 18:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20100712182421.GA8644@dert.cs.uchicago.edu>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTin3TYuC-y2U-o4NEgXH7N4M59vqWxXsa6J2Ae74@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Bradley,
Bradley Wagner wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Bradley Wagner wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
>> I've done a migration using "git-svn init" and "git-svn fetch". After >> the migration, I did a "git log refs/remotes/svn/6.7" and found that >> it listed both the commits that I merged into the 6.7 branch and the >> original commits to the trunk/master even though the SVN history >> obviously only has what was merged into that branch.
Yes, this is intentional. If you try ‘gitk --all’, you can see the history of all branches, where they branched from, and so on.
As far as I know the svn:mergeinfo is not actually used until a merge. Instead, git-svn uses subversion’s file copy tracking information to follow history past a branch point; see the find_parent_branch function in the git-svn script for details.
Hope that helps, Jonathan