git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [RFC] Git User's Survey 2010 (resend)

From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date
Jul 11, 2010, 17:42 UTC
Message-ID
<201007111942.54847.jnareb@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<AANLkTikQF_tMHz28k2pdpVdtbnE6EDZiKQbwmMTlp-c9@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 10 July 2010, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>> 2010/7/3 Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> I guess it is time for annual (so far) Git User's Survey.  Should
>>>> there be one?  When should it start, and how long should it last?
>>>
>>> Yes, I think there should definitely be one! IMO one month is enough.
>>
>> By the way, I think it is important that Git User's Survey 2010 lasts
>> past the holidays, i.e. into September or even October, even at the
>> cost of lasting two months, and not one month.
>>
>> What do you think about this?
> 
> My feeling is that the longer it is, the easier it's for people to
> postpone it, and then forget about it.

Hmmm... I haven't thought about this issue. I certainly don't plan for Git User's Survey 2010 to last longer than 2 months. We can always send / post reminders that the survey is coming to be closed.

The problem with duration of last year survey was that some announcements got delayed because of holidays.

> But I don't have a strong opinion either way.

I think that 15 August to 15 September, or to 15 October would be good time (this is currently preliminary only).

Show 17 quoted lines
>>>> == About you ==
>>>>
>>>> NOTES:
>>>> ^^^^^^
>>>> This section gives us a bit of demographical information about survey
>>>> responders.  Is it useful?  Should we leave it in survey, or remove it?
>>>>
>>>> Should we for example include 'gender' as one of questions?  Perl Survey
>>>> 2010 did.
>>>
>>> I don't see the point of 'gender'. What does that tells us?
>>
>> Well, one can say that 'age' doesn't tell us much either.
> 
> I disagree. I think younger people, specially the ones who have not
> been tainted by CVS, might find git easier to learn. Without this
> question it's not possible to find that correlation.
O.K., you convinced me: I'll leave age, but not add gender.
 
Show 18 quoted lines
>>>> === 10. What do you use to edit contents under version control with Git? ===
>>>>        What kind of editor, IDE or RAD you use working with Git?
>>>> (multiple choice, with other)
>>> [...]
>>>> NOTES:
>>>> ^^^^^^
>>>> Is this question useful, or should it be removed from survey?
>>>
>>> I think this is useful to correlate communities.
>>
>> Hmmm...
> 
> Sorry, I thought the answers would be the actual application used:
> Vim, Eclipse, MS Visual Studio, etc. If not, then I don't see the
> point.
> 
> At least I remember finding out that most people use vim in some
> previous survey, and I found that interesting.

The problem is with not going overboard with number of possible answers, but we can always take results of previous survey as hint (though I don't remember if free-form questions are analyzed yet)/

Show 17 quoted lines
>>>> === 19. Overall, how happy are you with Git? ===
>>>> (single choice)
>>> [...]
>>>> NOTES:
>>>> ^^^^^^
>>>> I'm not sure if this question is at all useful.
>>>
>>> I think it is. Otherwise how do we know that people are happy with it?
>>
>> Well, I think there is rather heavy bias that if people are unhappy
>> with Git, they wouldn't be using it (well, unless they have to), and
>> they wouldn't be responding to this Git User's Survey (because they
>> didn't found it, for example).
> 
> There's people that would rather be using something else for various
> reasons, but need to use git. Also, there's people that think that git
> is the best option, but not particularly ecstatic with it.
All right, let's keep it.
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
Previous: Felipe ContrerasNext: David Bainbridge
Message 19 of 24 in “[RFC] Git User's Survey 2010 (resend)”
  1. Jakub NarebskiJul 3, 2010
  2. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonJul 4, 2010
  3. Jakub NarebskiJul 4, 2010
  4. Yann DirsonJul 7, 2010
  5. Jakub NarebskiJul 7, 2010
  6. Felipe ContrerasJul 10, 2010
  7. David BainbridgeJul 4, 2010
  8. Jakub NarebskiJul 4, 2010
  9. David BainbridgeJul 4, 2010
  10. Jakub NarebskiJul 5, 2010
  11. Scott ChaconJul 4, 2010
  12. Jakub NarebskiJul 4, 2010
  13. Yann DirsonJul 7, 2010
  14. Jakub NarebskiJul 7, 2010
  15. Yann DirsonJul 8, 2010
  16. Felipe ContrerasJul 10, 2010
  17. Jakub NarebskiJul 10, 2010
  18. Felipe ContrerasJul 11, 2010
  19. Jakub NarebskiJul 11, 2010
  20. David BainbridgeJul 12, 2010
  21. Felipe ContrerasJul 12, 2010
  22. David BainbridgeJul 12, 2010
  23. Felipe ContrerasAug 9, 2010
  24. Jakub NarebskiAug 10, 2010

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.