Re: messages confusing
- From
- Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr>
- Date
- Jul 6, 2010, 08:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20100706085844.GB13054@vidovic>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v630t5dvo.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
The 05/07/10, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> > This is quite an old message; I don't think it has much to do with 1.7-ness > of your version. > > The first "uptodate" refers to your tree state being up-to-date. You > already had the necessary changes the other history wanted you to > have---they were acquired in your history before you started this merge by > some other means. Perhaps merging from other trees, or picking up > equivalent patches from mailing list, etc.
This is what I was guessing but wanted to be sure that the resulting messages were intended as is.
> A merge commit is still created in this case, in order to record the fact > that everything origin/master wanted to do to your history has already > been reconciled to your history. Otherwise "git log ..origin/master" will > still show commits your history does not have.
Thanks for the explanations.
-- Nicolas Sebrecht