Re: permissions

> Alex Riesen wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 00:27, William Pursell <bill.pursell@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >>> Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> writes:
> >>>
> >>>> The patch moves the function is_git_directory at the level of user
> >>>> interface where it wasn't before: it now complains and die.
> >>>> Not all callers of the function call it only to die if it fails.
> >>> Thanks for shooting it down before I had to look at it ;-)
> >> The point of the patch is that it now complains and dies.
> > 
> > At wrong point. Points, actually. There are many callers of the
> > function you modified. You should have looked at them all.
> 
> I did look at all 4 calls, and it seemed to me
> that localizing the change in one location is a better
> design than adding logic to 4 different locations.
> 
> >> Perhaps I'm being obtuse, but can you describe a situation
> >> in which this causes git to terminate inappropriately?
> > 
> > Maybe. BTW, can you? (if you try, I mean).
> 
> No, I can't.  As far as I can tell, the patch adds
> exactly the functionality that I want it to add.  You
> do make good points about its problems below, however,
> and you are right that I did miss the point of
> your criticism.  Thank you for clarifying.

> @@ -407,6 +413,11 @@ const char *setup_git_directory_gently(int *nongit_ok)
>                 }
>                 if (is_git_directory(DEFAULT_GIT_DIR_ENVIRONMENT))
>                         break;
> +               if (access(DEFAULT_GIT_DIR_ENVIRONMENT, X_OK)
> +                                && errno != ENOENT )
> +                       die_errno("Unable to access %s/%s",
> +                                cwd, DEFAULT_GIT_DIR_ENVIRONMENT);
> +
>                 if (is_git_directory(".")) {
>                         inside_git_dir = 1;
>                         if (!work_tree_env)