Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/3] add a library of code for producing structured output
- From
Eric Raymond <esr@thyrsus.com>
- Date
- Apr 11, 2010, 20:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20100411205704.GA16098@thyrsus.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <aae50060001ba0a214ed71ceff3fa480@212.159.54.234>
Julian Phillips <julian@quantumfyre.co.uk>:
> That should be much easier. Though actually I am fairly close to getting > _all_ output from ls-tree going through the output library ... (i.e. even > the normal no-option output). I don't know what people's opinion on this > approach is, but I thought it was worth a try anyway.
I make encouraging noises in your direction. This approach sounds like an orthogonality and consistency win.
-- <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>