Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] several notes refs, post-rewrite, notes rewriting
- From
Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
- Date
- Feb 22, 2010, 00:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <201002220132.53455.trast@student.ethz.ch>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vr5oeazhd.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Monday 22 February 2010 01:25:02 Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> writes: > > > core.notesRef should be in that list > > implicitly, and I think the natural position if it is unsorted would > > be: first. > > I think that is a sane thing to do, and then any additional ones can come > after that first one, in the order specified by displayRef. Isn't that > what you are doing, no?
Yes, I just wanted to spell out why I originally decided for the sorted instead of user-ordered way:
> > However, that means that changing core.notesRef or GIT_NOTES_REF > > can shuffle around your notes, which I thought would be confusing.
But that wasn't a strong preference at all, so doing it like you suggested (and like the code is in v4) is fine by me.
--
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch