Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] git-push: clean up some of the output from git push --porcelain

> Larry D'Anna <larry@elder-gods.org> writes:
> 
> > * Junio C Hamano (gitster@pobox.com) [100208 17:48]:
> >> *1* As I hinted repeatedly, I think many of them are mere churn, except
> >> for "don't advice porcelain scripts" (good) and perhaps "exit with failure
> >> status upon only this kind of failure" (I am undecided).  
> >
> > What about the "To" lines?  It seems that they really should go to stdout (if
> > --porcelain is selected).  Otherwise, how does the reader of stdout know which
> > refs got pushed to which remote?
> 
> I think that probably is an improvement.
> 
> We would probably need documentation updates to cover the parsing of "To",
> at least; it might be cleaner to have a separate section for porcelain
> writers.  And tests.  But this series won't hit next until 1.7.0 ships so
> we have enough time to polish the details.
> 
> I queued the series and once merged it to 'pu' but seeing some tests fail,
> I reverted the merge.  The error is somewhat curious...