Re: default behaviour for `gitmerge` (no arguments)

From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Jan 12, 2010, 16:23 UTC
Message-ID: <20100112162355.GB25092@coredump.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <7v7hrojukz.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:43:40AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 11 quoted lines

> The code indeed knows (as you can see "git pull" can figure it out) what
> other ref the current branch is configured to merge with by default.
> There is even a plumbing to do this for script writers.
> 
>     $ git for-each-ref --format='%(upstream)' $(git symbolic-ref HEAD)
> 
> We can teach this short-hand to "git merge", perhaps:
> 
>     $ git merge --default
> 
> But "no argument" cannot be the short-hand, because...

Hmm. If we had the oft-discussed-but-never-agreed-upon shorthand for "the upstream of" then we wouldn't need a special merge option. You could just do:

  git merge %HEAD ;# (or git merge %, IIRC the proposal correctly)

-Peff