Re: signing tags: user.name assumed to be gpg uid?
- From
Peter Vereshagin <peter@vereshagin.org>
- Date
- Dec 30, 2009, 10:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20091230104720.GA3229@screwed.box>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vaax1bi3e.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Oh Junio want you buy me a mersedes benz? 2009/12/29 13:12:05 -0800 Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> => To Peter Vereshagin :
JCH> > I notice that after I init and config user.name and user.email the JCH> > user.comment gets taken from ~/.gpg automatically. JCH> What is "user.comment"?
My probable suggestion about where the gpg key's comment field should be written for config --global. Sorry, it's not from ~/.gnupg
JCH> > Is it a correct behaviour? JCH> Yes, matching with user.name/user.email (actually committer information) JCH> is often the most convenient thing to do.
Is it necessary the pgp comment field to be present on the user.name? It isn't for From: in e-mail messages.
JCH> You can use user.signingkey configuration to use a key that doesn't match JCH> your name, too.
Thanks!
73! Peter pgp: A0E26627 (4A42 6841 2871 5EA7 52AB 12F8 0CE1 4AAC A0E2 6627)
-- http://vereshagin.org