Re: Branch shuffling after 1.6.6 release plans
- From
Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
- Date
- Dec 25, 2009, 11:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200912251230.48243.trast@student.ethz.ch>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vljgrgar9.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Thanks for 1.6.6!
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> * tr/maint-merge-ours-clarification (2009-11-15) 1 commit > - rebase: refuse to rebase with -s ours > > I do not think we reached a concensus for solving conflicts between "give > them rope" and "protect users from clearly meaningless combinations". The > author obviously is for the latter (and I am inclined to agree); Dscho > seems to think otherwise.
I can try hacking some internal option into the merge helpers, by which they declare to be (in)compatible with rebasing. I think this what Dscho or Sverre mentioned in the corresponding thread, but I forgot about it when I noticed you had already promoted the above to 'next'.
Show 6 quoted lines
> * tr/reset-checkout-patch (2009-11-19) 1 commit
> - {checkout,reset} -p: make patch direction configurable
>
> I do not particularly like a configuration like this that changes the
> behaviour of a command in a drastic way---it will make helping others
> much harder.I think it's not quite as drastic as you make it sound ;-)
But I don't need this feature, and Peff mentioned something about being happy except for the patch editing mode. Unfortunately the above pretty much hits the limits of add--interactive's flexibility, so an interactive direction toggling feature would need some rewiring.
--
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch