Re: What should a user expect from git log -M -- file
- From
Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
- Date
- Nov 27, 2009, 07:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20091127072820.GA17045@glandium.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <m3ocmpmcoq.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 09:14:37AM -0800, Jakub Narebski wrote:
Show 22 quoted lines
> Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> writes: > > > I recently reorganized a project of mine, and the result is that a lot of > > files moved from the top directory to a sub directory. > > > > Now, I innocently tried to 'git log -M' some of these files in the > > subdirectories, and well, the history just stops when the file was > > created. Obviously, if I put both the old and the new location it works, > > but shouldn't users expect 'git log -M -- file' to try to find the > > previous path and continue from there ? > > What you want is not > > git log -M -- file > > but > > git log --follow file > > "git log -M -- file" IIRC first applies path limiting, simplifying > history, *then* does rename detection, and finally filters output > (unless --full-diff is used).
That's what I was looking for, thanks. I would suggest to put --follow closer to -M and -C in the documentation, but the way the git-log manual is generated (including diff options) makes that impossible :(
Mike