Re: Creating something like increasing revision numbers

From: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Date: Oct 19, 2009, 00:48 UTC
Message-ID: <20091019004829.GD11739@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
In-Reply-To: <7vfx9gnwtw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On So, 18 Okt 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:

>  #2 Do not give such sequential number locally; the central repository is
>     the _only_ place that assigns such a number.  '?' stands for
>     'unnumbered'

[...]

Show 6 quoted lines

> Scheme #2 is a way to get some stablility; give the authority of numbering
> to the central repository and commits that haven't hit the central
> repository are left unnumbered.  But that is generally not very useful
> for your purpose of giving incrementing version number for building (the
> developers would want to build for testing before finally committing to
> publish the result to the central place).

That problem we have anyway with subversion, too, because as long as you do not commit your changes nothing will happen on package rebuild. So that is not a problem here.

Yes, we want server-sided linear numbers and anything *not* pushed to the server is unnumbered.

And that is also fine, because packages are built only from the server.

Best wishes

Norbert

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining                                        Associate Professor
JAIST Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology   preining@jaist.ac.jp
Vienna University of Technology                               preining@logic.at
Debian Developer (Debian TeX Task Force)                    preining@debian.org
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094      fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PUDSEY (n.)
The curious-shaped flat wads of dough left on a kitchen table after
someone has been cutting scones out of it.
			--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff