Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2009, #02; Sun, 11)
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Oct 14, 2009, 04:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20091014042417.GA28795@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vmy3w9qdd.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 03:52:46PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> > Hmm. I thought you wanted to re-order some of these for to put the > > porcelain and short formats into v1.6.6, but leave the status switchover > > for v1.7.0. > > We could build an alternate history between 3fa509d..46b77a6, revert the > merges 9558627 and 65c8513, and merge the alternate history. But is the > short format support so solid that it deserves to be in 1.6.6 in the > current shape?
Somewhere I seem to recall you saying that it would be nice to give the --short format some wider exposure as "git status --short" before making the "status is no longer commit --dry-run" switch-over. But now I can't find that message anywhere.
Let's not worry about it.
-Peff