Re: [PATCH] archive: Refuse to write the archive to a terminal.
- From
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
- Date
- Sep 17, 2009, 01:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090917014854.GD3274@feather>
- In-Reply-To
- <4AB0C7DE.7030109@viscovery.net>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 01:11:26PM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Josh Triplett schrieb: > > I considered adding a -f/--force option, like gzip has, but writing an > > archive to a tty seems like a sufficiently insane use case that I'll let > > whoever actually needs that write the patch for it. ;) > > How about '--output -' instead?
Yeah, that seems significantly better than --force. Though I don't particularly care for the '-' convention to mean 'stdout'; in principle that ought to create a file named '-' in the current directory. /dev/stdout makes more sense, and doesn't require any work on git's part beyond this patch.
- Josh Triplett