Re: Confusing git pull error message
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Sep 13, 2009, 20:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090913204231.GA8654@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v1vmar353.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 01:38:48PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I saw some discussion on improving the wording. Here is what I plan to > commit.
Thanks for picking this up, I meant to re-post with improvements.
> + else
> + echo "Your configuration specifies to merge the ref"
> + echo "'${upstream#refs/heads/}' from the remote, but no such ref"
> + echo "was fetched."What you have here is precisely what we observed. But I think one of the complaints was to say more explicitly "that ref doesn't exist on the remote", which I think should be the case if we have got to this point (anything else would have triggered an error in fetch).
I don't have a strong feeling either way, though.
-Peff