Re: [PATCH v2] status: list unmerged files last
- From
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
- Date
- Sep 2, 2009, 18:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090902183923.GA10581@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
- In-Reply-To
- <20090902180050.GB5998@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 02:00:50PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Yeah, we already have --untracked-files=<no|normal|all> and a matching > config variable. If there are cases people find useful, I don't see a > reason why we can't make other sections configurable, too. I think it > just somebody to write a patch for the behavior they think makes sense > (or at the very least a concrete proposal).
My main wishlist would be to have the same control for the changes to be committed for the big merge case, the use case being while resolving merges where those changes are those that have been dealt with and the remaining (hopefully much fewer) changes are those that still need attention.