git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

learning curve (aka Git User's Survey 2009 partial summary, part 2 - from first 10)

From
NSNicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr>
Date
Aug 18, 2009, 19:55 UTC
Message-ID
<20090818195550.GB12938@vidovic>
In-Reply-To
<200908181900.03356.jnareb@gmail.com>
The 18/08/09, Jakub Narebski wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> > I believe it would be interesting to know who (from the question 6.)
> > think what later. We may expect that people of the grade 4 and 5 ("can
> > offer advice" and "know it very well") underestimate the difficulty to
> > learn Git.
> 
> Well, you can do some analysis yourself, using just created filters at
> http://www.survs.com/shareResults?survey=2PIMZGU0&rndm=678J66QRA2
Thank you very much.
Show 15 quoted lines
> For example:
> 
> ================================================|
>                   |    proficiency with Git     |
> To learn          |-----------------------------|
>                   | any*[%] | 1-3 [%] | 4-5 [%] |
> ------------------------------------------------|
> Very easy         |     4%  |     3%  |     5%  |
> Easy              |    20%  |    19%  |    22%  |
> Reasonably easy   |    55%  |    55%  |    56%  |
> Hard              |    19%  |    20%  |    16%  |
> Very hard         |     2%  |     3%  |     1%  |
> ------------------------------------------------|
> Total respondents |   3005  |   1786  |   1212  |
> ================================================|

This looks consistent. Here are some more grained summaries based on your filters:

                      =========================================================
                      |                       TO LEARN (%)                    |
===============================================================================
Proficiency           | very easy | easy | reasonably easy | hard | very hard |
===============================================================================
no filter (any)       |      4    |  20  |       55        |  19  |     2     |
――――――――――――――――――――――|―――――――――――|――――――|―――――――――――――――――|――――――|―――――――――――|
1. novice             |      3    |  12  |       49        |  25  |    11     |
2. casual             |      2    |  17  |       54        |  25  |     3     |
3. everyday use       |      4    |  21  |       56        |  18  |     2     |
4. can offer advice   |      4    |  23  |       56        |  17  |     1     |
5. know it very well  |     11    |  20  |       54        |  14  |     1     |
===============================================================================
                      =========================================================
                      |                       TO USE   (%)                    |
===============================================================================
Proficiency           | very easy | easy | reasonably easy | hard | very hard |
===============================================================================
no filter (any)       |      9    |  37  |        45       |   8  |     1     |
――――――――――――――――――――――|―――――――――――|――――――|―――――――――――――――――|――――――|―――――――――――|
1. novice             |      5    |  17  |        47       |  25  |     7     |
2. casual             |      5    |  27  |        51       |  15  |     2     |
3. everyday use       |      8    |  36  |        47       |   8  |     1     |
4. can offer advice   |     11    |  44  |        40       |   4  |     0     |
5. know it very well  |     22    |  37  |        36       |   5  |     1     |
===============================================================================

What appears here first is that the averages of the third category ("everyday day use") are _very_ near from the averages of the whole users. This gives a good confidence in the results.

Simplified summary:
                      ===============================================
                      |                  TO LEARN (%)               |
=====================================================================
Proficiency           | (very) easy | reasonably easy | (very) hard |
=====================================================================
no filter (any)       |     24      |        55       |      21     |
――――――――――――――――――――――|―――――――――――――|―――――――――――――――――|―――――――――――――|
1. novice             |     15      |        49       |      36     |
2. casual             |     19      |        54       |      28     |
----------------------|-------------|-----------------|-------------|
3. everyday use       |     25      |        56       |      20     |
----------------------|-------------|-----------------|-------------|
4. can offer advice   |     27      |        56       |      18     |
5. know it very well  |     31      |        54       |      15     |
=====================================================================
                      ===============================================
                      |                  TO USE   (%)               |
=====================================================================
Proficiency           | (very) easy | reasonably easy | (very) hard |
=====================================================================
no filter (any)       |     36      |        45       |       9     |
――――――――――――――――――――――|―――――――――――――|―――――――――――――――――|―――――――――――――|
1. novice             |     22      |        47       |      32     |
2. casual             |     32      |        51       |      17     |
----------------------|-------------|-----------------|-------------|
3. everyday use       |     44      |        47       |       9     |
----------------------|-------------|-----------------|-------------|
4. can offer advice   |     55      |        40       |       4     |
5. know it very well  |     59      |        36       |       6     |
=====================================================================
-- 
Nicolas Sebrecht
Previous: Jakub Narebski
Message 6 of 6 in “Git User's Survey 2009 partial summary, part 2 - from first 10”
  1. Jakub NarebskiAug 17, 2009
  2. Johan HerlandAug 17, 2009
  3. Jakub NarebskiAug 17, 2009
  4. Nicolas SebrechtAug 18, 2009
  5. Jakub NarebskiAug 18, 2009
  6. learning curve (aka Git User's Survey 2009 partial summary, part 2 - from first 10)Nicolas Sebrecht, Aug 18, 2009

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.