Re: Linus' sha1 is much faster!
- From
- George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>
- Date
- Aug 17, 2009, 23:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090817231208.32039.qmail@science.horizon.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.2.00.0908171513230.6044@xanadu.home>
Show 7 quoted lines
>> The purpose of the rewrite is to avoid having to make >> pessimistic assumptions about people who don't respond. >> >> I suppose I should have made that request clearer: >> Is there anyone who claims copyright on anything here? >> Or would just like credit? >> If so, are you willing to donate it to the public domain?
Show 5 quoted lines
> I think this is much nicer to everyone involved. > > As far as I'm concerned, I'm OK with giving any small copyright I might > have in this SHA1 implementation, if any, to the public domain. > Credits are always nice.
My apologies. I read a lot of people talking about wanting the code under different licenses, and thought I'd just cut through it by providing some PD code.
I didn't turn around and look at it from the point of view of the people who'd put the work into developing it. I don't mean to deny anyone credit for their work. In fact, providing more detail is on the to-do list, but I haven't waded through the mail archives and tracked down who contributed what yet.
I'll work on those polish details once I have it producing the same assembly code as Linus'.
There are a lot of possible highly-permissive licenses if one is wanted (zlib, MIT, CC-by), but public domain seems simpler.